She can’t play us. We can play her. Why is that. Can anybody tell me?

Please vocalize the issue she is facing. Woman alone is alone. To team up is strength. No matter what you team up for, you do it to belong and to have power over. Cowards team up against those whom they cannot beat.

Advertisements

Art hires bullies and incompetence: my well-educated analysis which is based on experience. Experience is bad which I have been wondering how I am so unlucky, or there truly is something seriously wrong but not enough leverage to make that needed change. Some parties do not look for change in art because stagnant state of things works better for them.

When one first begins studying sculpting and your teacher is a sexist and chauvinist, strongly biased male to whom pedagogy seems to be an unknown concept one gets a pretty good idea of what to expect when one graduates. There are no illusions whatsoever of what lies ahead and how slowly things change in art which hugely believes in tradition what comes to gender roles, position and power of institutions and money, what is good art, what can be shown. Mostly art looks back so keenly. Needless to say I argued and questioned a lot. Old fashioned are also ways to do business, put up exhibitions, how artists are seen and treated, how much there is preconception and thinking you know even when you do not know shit. That is of course when you need the consultants. You can always rely on knowledge of a consultant but artist is an underdog if he or she is not well-known and well-networked. What else is there other than self-interest and all one can do can be done only for one’s own benefit, why else do it. Business in which one has to be an expert and know a lot there are many doing the work who do not have the needed resources: understanding and knowledge, capabilities to spark change, only talk about it just like politicians do.

As curious as it sounds when you start looking at the issue of what kind of people are drawn to business of art it could not be more clear: it is made to those who strive to win, be best at or at least look like they are, mostly the latter. The importance of image cannot be emphasized enough. To work in art you have to have a big ego to stand behind your work, be confident enough to stretch as far as possible with ideas of your own, try out ideas which you believe in and very often only you, fail or succeed, and accepting the result to move on with all the enthusiasm possible. What kinds of results we accept as a community and in what kind of environment we want to work it plays a big part of how to choose one’s perspective, on which side to stand and look into the scene where one is to create, be creative. What is the scene where art is shown or made to exist and why it is so narrow? It is not new that narcissism is a regular trait for artists and in the arts in general and need to be admired for one’s part and art must be one thing probably all want to have which is one thing essential in art, admiration, grandiose, infinity, eternal art and eternal unforgettable artists. Artists are admired when they get fame and fortune. Fame is much talked about as it is the gold pot which might be found when one is talented and lucky enough. What is that luck and what is talent? It is a weird business where much money circulates, art gets centered to certain places and artists have to be presented in certain places to have a name and be noticed within the system. So to be stepped over is not irregular, to be sexually harassed, discriminated, talked about in ill manner happens regularly, There are things to be expected but still they strike always as surprise because one wants to believe in kindness and good intentions. Cynicism is the first impression I get, always. It is no wonder I am always up against a crowd of fanatics who think know better and are better because art is about finding the truth and those who are on pedestals think they have found it and are deserving their status.

There are those who like to repeat over and over again one idea, implant it where ever they can because it is theirs and it represents themselves, something unchangeable, an era, an -ism, history, tradition, spectacle, experience after which tourists are expected to travel and spend money for. When we starve the idea of art into movable modules that function as branded palaces it is art for money and art for business’ sake. It is tourism and  the tourist is offered a possible art awe to be viewed, witnessed and experienced, remembered, photographed, be educated from. An art awe.., sensation, uplifting, knowledge, the act of looking and feeling the once in a life time touch of something grand, special, new or old and spectacular, always bigger. To find spectacular it has to be imported. Interesting is when new in art is made it often is made in the marginal and those who have rebelled against the establishment, education, hierarchy and traditions are those who have made the most interesting art and have had the lasting changing impact on art. Always there is a clash and crush necessary for that change to happen. The procedure of producing art is a machinery of media coverage, expensiveness, size, names, what catches the eye, mind and heart. To preserve quality and process of creating new which can be exiting cynicism is not good at all.

Artist, captor of light http://www.words-to-use.com/words/art/

Mixed messages, do you know what I mean?

What is art consumer supposed to think when making of an institution reveals to be one case after another strange of mishaps, strange errors of thought and intentions appear to be more or less suspicious? Is there room for thinking when criticism is unwanted and clearly the institution is wanted to be set without questions asked? Critical views against and for and about quality of art must be freely discussed as must be deals done by officials and representatives which deals obviously have got political ends. Does art exist without politics one may ask? Anyway who could be against art? It is fair to ask how art is produced, what and why something is trendy or famous and stays that way, what is the progress made within art and how does it show? Why does art itself has got an image of a good-doer, a charitable well-spirited voice waking up and bringing light into darkness? Partly that is what art does in places where the normal is grim. Art has potential to lift up in many ways, uplift the maker and the viewer. Does it lift up the institutions that work with art, is art for art and institutions for themselves? Of course. Art has value of a tool, if you ask me, as it should and must since it is not above people but for people. When art scene does something it usually always is a cause which is a good for all promoting human interest in general, whatever human interest may be, interest is and can be defined in many ways but we assume cause is something like human rights are for everybody, environment must be preserved, public spaces should have more beautiful art, art heals etc.

When there is confusion, denial and clear misunderstanding of what is racism, sexism, discrimination, hate speech, exploitation, class division and where goes the line to abuse in there where artists are to work, then one can wonder how do these people who work in art understand what is good art, what are suitable working conditions, how ethics is applied and how art should be implemented in the world today because it is a very different world than for example ten years ago, still change happens in art very slowly even though it claims otherwise. In situations where sexism, discrimination and racism are widely tolerated but unseen and are spoken against via art, that there is institutionalized way of interacting which includes sexism, discrimination and racism, it is too risky and difficult to make a difference to speak out. It is a fact that art is elitist, to be an artist is elitist but that elitism disappears when one refuses to work with fascist dishonest system. System in which without recognition artist is unknown. Art is therefore done for the system to recognize and artist to establish one’s position must play by the rules of the system.

Art spectator can expect to see the surface without much depth.

http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/arts-and-books/how-words-shape-our-world “He argues that all ethical outlooks share a common structure in which we experience a kind of call, divine or inner, which requires us to seek with varying success to overcome our limitations and blindness. To be open to this call requires that we can recognise “something as right or worthy, and this recognition cannot be dispassionate.” Emotion and empathy are thus central to moral reasoning.”

How about things we do not notice? Do they matter, is our perception absolute?

Surely we all know answer to that question. Demanding is to admit flawed sight, impressions, assumptions based on vision and bias. Things we do not want to see or denounce from existence, invisible to some may be very living and alive for some. Those in search of truth must comprehend that they do not see all and all that is visible is not all there is.

To see someone, what does it mean?

The machine of our mind and how it is tuned to notice things, to which details we pay attention to and which we do not, for those who consider outer characteristics important measures of people the machine truly is working only one way. For those to whom to know someone is to look at and pick up clues to which stick and rely on, machine mind works as any factory robot. It is the simplest way of discriminating and separating humans. Stupidity with this kind of method of knowing anything is that most information stay unfound. Lazy mind trusts information seen and trusts the idea that any peculiarity and difference is a threat and laughably to be shut out without need to be understood as normal part of humanity. What is normal can be very narrow image and most of us do not want to understand or expand their horizon with variety. Variety and multiculturalism is dangerous and flammable, one can ask why so? Clashes between opposites are more likely to happen because neither can give up their truth. To move closer to one another means desire to understand and accept. Saddest thing is when it is the parent who does not want to understand and see his/her child as she/he is, when parents have their image set what child should be and reality is quite different of the imagined one. To imagine someone to be something and then be disappointed when that illusion does not fit reality. When someone is more than the imagined set of characteristics, ideals to fit into, for example ideal of a woman. That ideal is a highly minimized human being made to serve and settle for the given ideas, person who must be afraid to make an exception trying to do differently. https://www.good.is/articles/ovarian-psycos 
To see someone or that someone to stay unseen can be a choice or it can be a given strategy. We don’t want to see, we don’t want to be seen. We choose to display parts of ourselves like toes, harmless, and we must be seen to be whole persons still. We do not trust people whom we do not see. How seen can we be or is good for us to be seen is an interesting issue as to hide oneself can be done in so many ways and the expose of oneself plays tunnel-like vision where images move fast, where we look and look but don’t see and fun of the process where we play with image of ourselves, fun of exposure, fun of visibility and being recognized, fun of speed and the issue of what is actually being exposed blurring.